When would you typically prefer to use a User Map Function over a Standard Map Function?

Choosing to use a User Map Function is most suitable when you need to implement complex logic that demands multiple steps. User Map Functions offer the flexibility to perform sophisticated data transformations that go beyond straightforward modifications. They allow developers to write custom scripts or logic that can manipulate data in intricate ways, accommodating various conditions and processing requirements.

In situations where transformation logic is not merely about direct, one-to-one mappings but involves decisions, calculations, or aggregations based on varying factors, a User Map Function becomes essential. This capability is crucial when dealing with complex integrations where standard transformations might fall short.

Being able to define complex logic enables the creation of tailored solutions that accurately meet the specific needs of the data processing task at hand, significantly enhancing the integration workflows. Other options like applying simple one-step transformations or using basic data types do not justify the need for a User Map Function, as those can often be adequately handled with Standard Map Functions. Additionally, while performance is important, the use of User Map Functions is more about the complexity of the logic they can handle rather than purely performance considerations.